From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 21:22:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20080411212222.b3c1177e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080410203354.f0a6f464.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080411134036.GB3821@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:40044 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751162AbYDLEXE (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:23:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080411134036.GB3821@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >... > > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1: > >... > > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch > > > > ext4 doesn't build on m68k > >... > > Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as > 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to > fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm? Yes, it's the bitops screwup. I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something might be happening.