From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:13:17 +0530 Message-ID: <20080412184317.GB18122@skywalker> References: <20080410203354.f0a6f464.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080411134036.GB3821@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080411212222.b3c1177e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from E23SMTP01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.162]:38950 "EHLO e23smtp01.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755595AbYDLSnd (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:43:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080411212222.b3c1177e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:22:22PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:40:36 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:33:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > >... > > > Changes since 2.6.25-rc8-mm1: > > >... > > > +ext4-is-busted-on-m68k.patch > > > > > > ext4 doesn't build on m68k > > >... > > > > Is this due to the generic_find_next_le_bit compile error I reported as > > 2.6.25 regression (there seems to be some discussion recently how to > > fix it - hopefully for 2.6.25) or is there even more breakage in -mm? > > Yes, it's the bitops screwup. > > I saw some related linux-ext4 email float past yesterday, so something > might be happening. > It would really help if we can get some m68k people to look at patch i posted. http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/5944 -aneesh