From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add regression test for clearing an xattr block Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:46:05 -0500 Message-ID: <4803601D.9090802@redhat.com> References: <47FF8A50.2030800@redhat.com> <20080414032755.GF8058@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ext4 development To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33339 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751103AbYDNNqI (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:46:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080414032755.GF8058@webber.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Apr 11, 2008 10:57 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> I got burned by the bug at: >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/e2fsprogs.git;a=commitdiff;h=86bc90f4f11df090f86dc764a4ea2d6dd5c13ffe >> >> so figured maybe a testcase was in order... >> 20/20 hindsight I guess! > > Is the "ea_checks" patch and respective test in the upstream e2fsprogs? > We had added additional checks to e2fsck for xattr blocks/large inodes. Ah, it is in git, I had missed that. Looks like it does cover the case I sent and much more, so... never mind. Thanks, -Eric