From: David Miller Subject: Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080425.005816.249606540.davem@davemloft.net> References: <48118B73.6000700@gmail.com> <20080425.004943.148536408.davem@davemloft.net> <48118EAB.5040004@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, rjw@sisk.pl, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, clameter@sgi.com To: jirislaby@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57062 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754169AbYDYH6R (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:58:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48118EAB.5040004@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jiri Slaby Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:56:27 +0200 > On 04/25/2008 09:49 AM, David Miller wrote: > > Two hyperthreads per-core? > > Hmm, how to find out? I suppose it will show up 4 (virtual) processors in > cpuinfo, right? Although there is ht bit in cpuinfo on each core and > CONFIG_X86_HT=y, I don't see 4 cpus. Ok, good to know. > > If so that could match up to the pattern. It is just one theory > > though. The wireless possibility holds just as much weight. > > The mac80211 is theory too so far :). I'll try to do some commit mining of my own. Thanks for all of the info so far.