From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:00:05 +0200 Message-ID: <48118F85.4060703@gmail.com> References: <48118B73.6000700@gmail.com> <20080425.004943.148536408.davem@davemloft.net> <48118EAB.5040004@gmail.com> <20080425.005816.249606540.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, rjw@sisk.pl, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, clameter@sgi.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:3625 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758066AbYDYIAM (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:00:12 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so3494850fgb.17 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:00:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080425.005816.249606540.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/25/2008 09:58 AM, David Miller wrote: >>> If so that could match up to the pattern. It is just one theory >>> though. The wireless possibility holds just as much weight. >> The mac80211 is theory too so far :). > > I'll try to do some commit mining of my own. BTW Doesn't exist any tool to compare diffs? Particularly 2.6.28-rc8-mm1..2.6.28-rc8-mm2 with 2.6.25..2.6.25-git2... I would just give it a try.