From: Eric Sandeen Subject: jbd2 patches in stable queue Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:07:07 -0500 Message-ID: <48162E6B.8010607@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ext4 development Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54264 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763046AbYD1UHJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:07:09 -0400 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3SK79M1000526 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:07:09 -0400 Received: from pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (pobox-2.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3SK78Mb019010 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:07:08 -0400 Received: from liberator.sandeen.net (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by pobox-2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3SK77aS004312 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:07:08 -0400 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ted et al: these 3 patches in the stable queue: patches/jbd2-tidy-up-revoke-cache-initialization-and-destruction.patch patches/jbd2-eliminate-duplicated-code-in-revocation-table-init-destroy-functions.patch patches/jbd2-replace-potentially-false-assertion-with-if-block.patch don't seem to have their jbd counterparts merged anywhere, -mm or Linus' tree. Just a heads up, in case we don't want jbd2 to diverge further from jbd by including them in the pull request. Thanks, -Eric