From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] ext3/4: fix uninitialized bs in ext3/4_xattr_set_handle() Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:54:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20080514155430.a6b7da8f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <4827B878.50903@oracle.com> <20080512170254.f79fe869.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4828FD68.40608@oracle.com> <200805141256.43272.agruen@suse.de> <20080514160035.GD28594@kroah.com> <20080514102809.3fc190f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080514223003.GJ7054@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: greg@kroah.com, agruen@suse.de, tiger.yang@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org To: Theodore Tso Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080514223003.GJ7054@mit.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 14 May 2008 18:30:03 -0400 Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:28:09AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > It's in -mm and I just added the "Cc:stable" tag to it. > > This patch has both ext3 and ext4 changes in it, so Andrew, I'm > assuming that you'll push it directly to Linus in the near future? Yes, today. > That's why I didn't suck it into the ext4 tree.... Yup. Usually I have to split these things up but this time I decided to leave it as a single patch. Not sure why, really.