From: Hidehiro Kawai Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] jbd: ordered data integrity fix Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:55:22 +0900 Message-ID: <4846749A.3040206@hitachi.com> References: <4843CE15.6080506@hitachi.com> <4843CF30.9050801@hitachi.com> <20080603153304.741eaa2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sct@redhat.com, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, jbacik@redhat.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, tytso@mit.edu, yumiko.sugita.yf@hitachi.com, satoshi.oshima.fk@hitachi.com To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from mail9.hitachi.co.jp ([133.145.228.44]:53109 "EHLO mail9.hitachi.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754020AbYFDKz3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:55:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080603153304.741eaa2b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:45:04 +0900 > Hidehiro Kawai wrote: > >>In ordered mode, if a buffer being dirtied exists in the committing > > I changed this text to read "if a file data buffer being dirtied". > Please do be careful when describing all these buffers, else it gets > more confusing that it already is. Sorry for my misleading description. I'll be careful hereafter. Thanks, -- Hidehiro Kawai Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory Linux Technology Center