From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: Test results for ext4 Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:41:00 -0500 Message-ID: <4846B78C.3020102@redhat.com> References: <48402253.8040407@bull.net> <4841A871.3020500@redhat.com> <4844B71F.3070906@redhat.com> <4846B5F9.8050906@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: ext4 development To: Valerie Clement Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:33853 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755170AbYFDPlh (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 11:41:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4846B5F9.8050906@bull.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Valerie Clement wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> This was with e2fsprogs-1.39 for ext3, e2fsprogs-1.40.10 for ext4, a= nd >> xfsprogs-2.9.8 for xfs. > I was using xfsprogs-2.9.0, maybe too old version... > I'm updating them and I'll run my tests again. 2.9.0 is about a year old... 2.9.5 got some defaults changes for perfomance reasons, so it might make a difference. If kernel is bleeding edge probably might as well use all bleeding-edge tools, too. = :) =2E.. > I added a link to the scripts I used in the test description section = in: > http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-write-2.6.26-rc2.htm= l > http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-readwrite-2.6.26-rc2= =2Ehtml Great, thanks! I think the hardware comparison is interesting... -Eric > Val=E9rie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html