From: Gary Hawco <ghawco@cox.net>
Subject: (unknown)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:47:10
Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20080616134710.01b18a90@pop.west.cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:41867 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753674AbYFPUrM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:47:12 -0400
Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75])
          by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP
          id <20080616204706.WWGN7004.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>
          for <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:47:06 -0400
Subject: 
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>

Had a couple of questions as to what flex_bg & meta_bg features involve.  I
think flex_bg has to do with areas of metadata skipped during e2fsck, but I
am not sure about meta_bg.  And is meta_bg a mount option or a feature
specified during mkfs.ext4dev?  And if so, I guess you would use
mkfs.ext4dev -t meta_bg?

Any insight would be most appreciated.

Gary Hawco