From: Mikael Pettersson Subject: Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:32:24 +0200 Message-ID: <18522.6552.622680.92788@harpo.it.uu.se> References: <4859F075.2050207@linux.intel.com> <21d7e9970806182242na130e47i85839c4550b4ba03@mail.gmail.com> <20080619081146.GC17630@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Airlie , Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080619081146.GC17630@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk writes: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 03:42:34PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > In the kerneloops.org stats, a new oops is rapidly climbing the charts. > > > The oops is a page fault in the ext3 "do_slit" function, and the first > > > report of it was with 2.6.26-rc6-git3. > > > > > > It happens with various applications; the backtraces are at: > > > > > > http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=do_split > > > > This is a bug in rawhide in gcc miscompiling something... > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451068 > > If I understand it correctly that's a bug in upstream gcc 4.3.1 > (but not in gcc 4.3.0)? > > Expect a lot more of this to pop up in the future. > Should we #error for gcc 4.3.1? There are other nasty bugs in gcc-4.3.0. I actually had to completely ban 4.3.0 in a user-space project I'm involved with (Erlang) due to gcc PR36339 (fixed in 4.3.1). What's the gcc bugzilla number for this new 4.3.1 bug?