From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:17:13 -0500 Message-ID: <485A6A69.8090402@redhat.com> References: <4859F075.2050207@linux.intel.com> <485A668D.3050306@redhat.com> <485A680B.3020004@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton To: Arjan van de Ven Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:57639 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754689AbYFSORU (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:17:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <485A680B.3020004@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>> In the kerneloops.org stats, a new oops is rapidly climbing the charts. >>> The oops is a page fault in the ext3 "do_slit" function, and the first >>> report of it was with 2.6.26-rc6-git3. >>> >>> It happens with various applications; the backtraces are at: >>> >>> http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=do_split >> Arjan, I was just looking at kerneloops last night, seeing the count for >> this oops climb, and was wishing there were some way to annotate an oops >> signature with more info. If I could have tagged this with the RH >> bugzilla nr. it might have saved a lot of time for folks. Is this >> feasible? Or is finding the oops text in bugzilla the only way? >> > > there's a way to add a description to oopses (you might have seen some of these > descriptions already); however I've not implemented an account system yet so for > now it's only me who can add these. Ok, that was my guess. I'll shoot you an email next time. :) Thanks, -Eric