From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: Performance of ext4 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:54:25 +0530 Message-ID: <20080710092425.GA16451@skywalker> References: <20080612180605.GD22481@skywalker> <20080616175408.GF3279@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20080616181353.GA20686@skywalker> <20080619110947.GB11516@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Holger Kiehl , Girish Shilamkar Return-path: Received: from e28smtp01.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.1]:54969 "EHLO e28esmtp01.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752728AbYGJJZH (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:25:07 -0400 Received: from d28relay04.in.ibm.com (d28relay04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.61]) by e28esmtp01.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6A9OYlL022470 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:54:34 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (d28av03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.65]) by d28relay04.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m6A9OCkG1462522 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:54:12 +0530 Received: from d28av03.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av03.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6A9OXHB030151 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:54:34 +0530 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 08:11:15AM +0000, Holger Kiehl wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Holger Kiehl wrote: > > > I did try newer patch queue (ext4-patch-queue-a5d48915447f44c3af6ce8e1c91d45b452977fcf) > from today, but I immediatly hit an oops as soon as I untar a file, see below. > I am able to reproduce this. Revert the patch Fix-EXT_MAX_BLOCK.patch. -aneesh