From: "Theodore Ts'o" Subject: Making it easier for end users to use ext4 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:24:05 -0400 Message-ID: To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.ORG ([69.25.196.31]:36597 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753324AbYGNTYH (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:24:07 -0400 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: So I got a comment on my recent blog posting about using ext4 that Googling ext4 results in a lot of ancient status reports and not a lot of good information about how to get started with ext4. The comment was fair, so I took a few minutes to update this web page: http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Howto with some getting started information. Eric, when you have a chance, could you take a quick peek at the Fedora Core section of that page and update it appropriately. It would probably be a good idea to include the yum repository with the latest 1.41 e2fsprogs RPM's, etc. One other thought is if we start encouraging people to use ext4 on FC9, whether it might be a good idea to take all of the patches to ext4 since 2.6.25, add them to the patch queue, and then back port the resulting stack of patches to 2.6.25 so that FC9 users who are interested in testing ext4 would get the benefit of the latest ext4 code, and also so any bug reports we get would also be against the latest code. Alternatively, the repository could just simply include 2.6.26 plus the latest ext4 patch set, whichever would be easier. If other ext4 developers have a chance, it would be a good idea to go through the http://ext4.wiki.kernel.org site, and do some grooming of the site. Some of the pages like the FAQ, which were originally targetted primarily at ext4 developers, may need to have some of the more developer-centric content moved to other pages now that we will start having more users coming to look at that site. And of course, there is some very badly out-of-date information on that site as well! - Ted