From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Re: suspiciously good fsck times? Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:47:59 -0400 Message-ID: <487BF3BF.9040608@redhat.com> References: <20080710172829.GF10402@mit.edu> <20080710175354.GA3447@mit.edu> <48766D71.7050100@gmail.com> <20080714211913.GQ6239@webber.adilger.int> Reply-To: rwheeler@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Theodore Tso , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39053 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754977AbYGOAsN (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:48:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080714211913.GQ6239@webber.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jul 10, 2008 16:13 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > >> It would be interesting to rerun with the 46 million files in one >> directory as well (basically, for working sets that have no natural >> mapping into directories like some object based workloads). >> > > I think you'll hit a limit around 15M files in a single directory. > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Probably still worth a quick test, just to see how well it holds up at the edge, thanks! ric