From: Goswin von Brederlow Subject: Re: ext4 64bit (disk >16TB) question Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:13:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87tzer9lcx.fsf@frosties.localdomain> References: <87bq10w8gv.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <87y743vh3q.fsf@frosties.localdomain> <487CA331.8050403@redhat.com> <200807151601.20881.bs@q-leap.de> <487CAF6A.8070403@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: rwheeler@redhat.com Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:53992 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753659AbYGOQNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:13:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <487CAF6A.8070403@redhat.com> (Ric Wheeler's message of "Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:08:42 -0400") Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ric Wheeler writes: > How long would you wait for something like fsck to run to completion > before you would need to go to back up tapes? 6 hours? 1 day? 1 week > ;-) ? Backup? What are backups? :)) A hardware raid6 resync takes about 16h. A Software raid6 (over 6 hardware raid6) resync takes 1-2 days. With lustre the fsck has to be done on the MDT (meta data target) to build a database file and on all the OST (object storage target). So there is some parallelization in the system. But each OST, if we get ext4 64bit working, would be 28TB. I would assume days for an fsck run. Weeks would not be good and less than a day is totaly unrealistic. But a few days for an fsck of 400-800TB filesystem isn't so bad. Reading that amount from backup will take ages too, if you even have one. MfG Goswin