From: "Mike Snitzer" Subject: Re: [patch 069/283] ext3: handle corrupted orphan list at mount Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:43:01 -0400 Message-ID: <170fa0d20807251143r5603313fv44dac30247365c65@mail.gmail.com> References: <200807250702.m6P721g8028456@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <170fa0d20807251133y9a09dcaqcdc35de7d0ad2a4f@mail.gmail.com> <170fa0d20807251141v4f0edfax958639b53daf7666@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: duaneg@dghda.com Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:25098 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751663AbYGYSnC (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:43:02 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so2142816waf.23 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:43:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20807251141v4f0edfax958639b53daf7666@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:02 AM, wrote: >>> From: "Duane Griffin" >>> >>> If the orphan node list includes valid, untruncatable nodes with nlink > 0 >>> the ext3_orphan_cleanup loop which attempts to delete them will not do so, >>> causing it to loop forever. Fix by checking for such nodes in the >>> ext3_orphan_get function. >>> >>> This patch fixes the second case (image hdb.20000009.softlockup.gz) >>> reported in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10882. >>> >>> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] >>> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: printk warning fix] >>> Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin >>> Cc: >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton >> >>> diff -puN fs/ext3/inode.c~ext3-handle-corrupted-orphan-list-at-mount fs/ext3/inode.c >>> --- a/fs/ext3/inode.c~ext3-handle-corrupted-orphan-list-at-mount >>> +++ a/fs/ext3/inode.c >>> @@ -2253,6 +2253,19 @@ static void ext3_free_branches(handle_t >>> } >>> } >>> >>> +int ext3_can_truncate(struct inode *inode) >>> +{ >>> + if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) >>> + return 0; >>> + if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) >>> + return 1; >>> + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) >>> + return 1; >>> + if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) >>> + return !ext3_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode); >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> /* >>> * ext3_truncate() >>> * >>> @@ -2297,12 +2310,7 @@ void ext3_truncate(struct inode *inode) >>> unsigned blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize; >>> struct page *page; >>> >>> - if (!(S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || >>> - S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))) >>> - return; >>> - if (ext3_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode)) >>> - return; >>> - if (IS_APPEND(inode) || IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)) >>> + if (!ext3_can_truncate(inode)) >>> return; >> >> I may be missing something here but doesn't the above change the logic >> that was used in ext3_truncate for the S_ISDIR and S_ISLNK cases? >> >> Before ext3_truncate would be short-circuited if S_ISDIR or S_ISLNK, >> now it won't... is that intended? > > Gah, I mistakenly read it as only being !S_ISDIR heh.. I read it as only being !S_ISREG .. again sorry.