From: Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Porting Zfs features to ext2/3
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:49:18 +1000
Message-ID: <488CFB6E.3020602@cse.unsw.edu.au>
References: <18674437.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080727224958.GB7922@mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: postrishi <postrishi@gmail.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU ([129.94.242.24]:57096 "EHLO
	note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751032AbYG0XEZ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:04:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080727224958.GB7922@mit.edu>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Ted

Theodore Tso wrote:
> The btrfs filesystem effort is an attempt to create a filesystem 
> that will leapfrog the ZFS feature set, but it will probably take 
> longer to reach production ready status than ext4.

Since you mention btrfs here and since I've read this earlier too, do
you know if btrfs will be the default Linux file system in the future,
like extX has been?

> 
> Regards,
> 
> - Ted