From: Eric Sandeen Subject: tracepoints in ext4 (and/or ext3?) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:18:07 -0500 Message-ID: <48A09E7F.7060605@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ext4 development Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:56959 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753725AbYHKUSJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:18:09 -0400 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7BKI9EI015656 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:18:09 -0400 Received: from file.rdu.redhat.com (file.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.147]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m7BKI9MM028804 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:18:09 -0400 Received: from Liberator.local (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by file.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m7BKI8a6031427 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:18:08 -0400 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: As just an initial inquiry, I'm wondering how people would feel about putting some tracepoints (trace_mark()) into ext[34] for monitoring the fs behavior. Good/bad/indifferent? Thanks, -Eric