From: Celine Bourde Subject: Ext4 test results Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:57:29 +0200 Message-ID: <48A963A9.107@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , jean-pierre.dion@bull.net, frederic.bohe@bull.net, SOLOFO RAMANGALAHY , "Jose R. Santos" , celine.bourde@bull.net To: Mingming Cao Return-path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:54906 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750986AbYHRMBY (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:01:24 -0400 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi all, I have launch valerie's performance test to compare ext4 evolution from kernel 2.6.26-rc2 to kernel 2.6.27-rc1. Both results are available here : http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-write-2.6.26-rc2.htm http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080818-ffsb/ffsb-write-2.6.27-rc1.html barriers were disabled for this tests. We could notice significant improvement of number of extents per file with following cases : mkfs option : -I 256 -O uninit_groups mount option : data=writeback, nomballoc and mkfs option : -I 256 -O uninit_groups,flex_bg -G 64 mount option : data=writeback, nomballoc fsck time appears now constant (kernel 2.6.27-rc1). Cel.