From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vfs: vfs-level fiemap interface Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:58:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20080914195811.GE13074@mit.edu> References: <1221331767-16870-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <20080914134711.GA21746@infradead.org> <20080914180132.GC13074@mit.edu> <20080914180843.GA31649@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linuxfoundation.org, Mark Fasheh , mtk.manpages@gmail.com To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from BISCAYNE-ONE-STATION.MIT.EDU ([18.7.7.80]:36475 "EHLO biscayne-one-station.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753855AbYINT64 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:58:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080914180843.GA31649@infradead.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 02:08:44PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Sometimes I really wish people would read email before replying to them. > I did not say anywhere that this flag (at least for the use case I think > it is which no one even bothered to document) is good, but the name > and description are utterly wrong, and misleading. Want to pick a name, then? - Ted