From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] jbd2: Create proc entry with bdevname+i_ino. Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:42:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20080915144230.GA21089@infradead.org> References: <20080908233114.GD20100@mail.oracle.com> <20080914084003.GP4563@wotan.suse.de> <20080914090306.GF30537@mit.edu> <20080914160635.GA31958@infradead.org> <20080915011042.GA29193@mail.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Christoph Hellwig , Theodore Tso , Mark Fasheh , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:42638 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753394AbYIOOmd (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 10:42:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080915011042.GA29193@mail.oracle.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 06:10:42PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > Christoph, > Not sure what you mean here. Do you mean switching over > wholesale without the JBD compat config option? We're currently > tracking a spinlock deadlock in JBD2, so I don't know if we're ready for > that. > If you don't get this, I'll try to track you down tomorrow. Sorry, not related to jbd2 in ocfs2, but the bdevname bits in this thread. I saw Ted posted another patch later that basically does the same for the journal dev as the VFS does for sb->s_id so this is okay. I still think we should do the / substitution in get_sb_bdev, too and will send a separate patch for it.