From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] jbd2: Add buffer triggers Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:25:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20080929012527.GI8711@mit.edu> References: <20080917232629.GB20752@mail.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:40166 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751073AbYI2BZ3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:25:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080917232629.GB20752@mail.oracle.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 04:26:30PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: > Filesystems often to do compute intensive operation on some > metadata. If this operation is repeated many times, it can be very > expensive. It would be much nicer if the operation could be performed > once before a buffer goes to disk. Sorry for the delay in reviewing this patch, but I've got a question. Right now you are calling the commit trigger *after* doing the escape data copying. This means that if the commit trigger is going to modify the buffer (in the case of the checksum being stored in-line in the block, which I gather is the case in OCFS2, right?), if you get unlucky and the block begins with the four bytes JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER, then the checksum will be in the value which gets written out to the log, but *not* to the value in the buffer head that will ultimately get written to the final location on disk. In the normal case where the journal wraps and then truncated, it means the checksum will never get written to the disk. That seems bad. :-) I believe the correct location to fire the per-buffer commit trigger is right after the first kmap_atomic, right before the comment "Check for escaping". This also fixes the bug where if the checksum is stored in the first four bytes of the block, in the case where you have bad luck and the checksum == JBD2_MAGIC_NUMBER, you won't end up with a corrupted journal. Do you agree? If so, please let me know and I can fix up the patch, or just submit to me an updated patch. Thanks, - Ted