From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: possible (ext4 related?) memory leak in kernel 2.6.26 Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 18:12:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20081007221256.GF15929@mit.edu> References: <20080930211854.GZ10831@mit.edu> <20080930222358.1FF30EAC415@quatramaran.ens.fr> <20081003003548.GA18138@mit.edu> <20081005091526.GA678@goelette.ens.fr> <20081005122752.GB27335@mit.edu> <20081005161214.GA2985@goelette.ens.fr> <20081006025006.GA9289@mit.edu> <48EA2F20.7020309@redhat.com> <20081006175502.GA12937@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Sandeen , Quentin Godfroy , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Quentin Godfroy Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:37087 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754618AbYJGWNI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Oct 2008 18:13:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081006175502.GA12937@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 01:55:02PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > Here are updates to the two patches I sent you. The first fixes some > printk labels and requires that the debugging dump ioctl be triggered > by root; the second fixes the think-o that Eric pointed out earlier > this morning. Hey Quentin, just wanted to check in and find out if the patches seem to be working for you. They seem to solve the problem on my side; I can no longer reproduce the problem. Is it working for you? Thanks, regards, - Ted