From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] ext4: Rename ext4dev to ext4 Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:46:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20081010194656.GF8645@mit.edu> References: <1223356130-22006-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <48EF9853.8070202@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:53466 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760060AbYJJTq6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:46:58 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48EF9853.8070202@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:00:51PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > The ext4 filesystem is getting stable enough that it's time to drop > > the "dev" prefix. Also remove the requirement for the TEST_FILESYS > > flag. > > What do you think of adding a MODULE_ALIAS("ext4dev"); to this change? > > Poor Fedora users trying to boot a kernel with this rename and ext4(dev) > on root are failing to mount root at boot time. > > mkinitrd looks at the existing fstab, sees that the rootfs is "ext4dev" > and tries to mount root as ext4dev.... this fails. >From discussion on the irc channel; the MODULE_ALIAS() allows the filesystem to be loaded, but mount still tries to load the wrong filesystem, and so it fails. I guess one thing we *could* do is register both ext4dev and ext4.... maybe with a config option for backwards compatibility? And try to wean people off of it as quickly as possible. - Ted