From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2 2/5] ext4: unlock group before ext4_error Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:29:29 +0530 Message-ID: <20081123135929.GA16127@skywalker> References: <1227285875-18011-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1227285875-18011-2-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20081123133704.GA26473@mit.edu> <20081123134304.GB26473@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from E23SMTP01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.18.162]:55571 "EHLO e23smtp01.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757904AbYKWOA5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:00:57 -0500 Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.234]) by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mANE0tCT021031 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:00:55 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (d23av04.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.139]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.1) with ESMTP id mANDxviE4243598 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:59:58 +1100 Received: from d23av04.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av04.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id mANDxdek010233 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:59:39 +1100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081123134304.GB26473@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 08:43:04AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 08:37:04AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > > This looks like it came from the patch > > aneesh-8-fix-double-free-of-blocks which in a message sent roughly at > > the same time you told me to drop from the patch queue. So I'm adding > > this to the patch queue without this rejected hunk. > > Sorry, I managed to confuse myself. The patch conflict went away > after I removed the patch per your e-mail. I have so many *.rej files > in my tree from failed patches that I managed to confuse myself. I'll > have to clean them out.... > > My comments about how difficult it is to figure out where your patches > apply are still relevant...... I'm still trying to figure this all > out, but you'll need to check the patch queue afterwards. Can you > please give me a status readout about which patches I can move into > the stable part of the tree, please? And what the status is of the > other patches? Thanks!!! > All the patches I do are mostly after applying all the patches in the patch queue. I would wait for some review and wider testing on the patches before they can be moved to stable part of the patch queue. -aneesh