From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: ext4 changes in linux-next Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:32:09 -0800 Message-ID: <20090107153209.b49d5cf7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090107140436.46a17a3e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35373 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753908AbZAGXdF (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 18:33:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090107140436.46a17a3e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:04:36 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > a pile of new ext4 stuff just turned up in linux-next filesystem-freeze-add-error-handling-of-write_super_lockfs-unlockfs.patch is dependent on things which are in linux-next's fs/ext4/super.c. I could fix the (large) reject and proceed, but then you'd have reject-fixing to do as well. Do you plan on merging all those changes into mainline for 2.6.29? If so, please do so asap? If not, I'll just go ahead and trash your stuff :)