From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Add Kconfig help which notes that ext4 needs CONFIG_LSF Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:04:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20090109080414.GH32491@kernel.dk> References: <1231262490-15594-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <20090108113915.GL13721@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Ext4 Developers List To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:1897 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753352AbZAIIF0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:05:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090108113915.GL13721@webber.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 08 2009, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Jan 06, 2009 12:21 -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ config LSF > > + The ext4 filesystem requires that this feature be enabled in > > + order to support filesystems that have the huge_file feature > > + enabled. Otherwise, it will refuse to mount any filesystems > > + that use the huge_file feature, which is enabled by default > > + by mke2fs.ext4. > > Wouldn't it make sense to just enable this by default if ext4 is enabled? Agree, since it'll prevent the fs from mounting, using a select makes a lot more sense. -- Jens Axboe