From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [stable] Patch Upstream: ext4: Fix s_dirty_blocks_counter if block allocation failed with nodelalloc Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:30:12 -0500 Message-ID: <20090115013012.GA8914@mit.edu> References: <200901090125.n091P7CU028977@hera.kernel.org> <20090114234748.GD24230@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sct@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, adilger@sun.com, stable@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:40937 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751309AbZAOBah (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:30:37 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114234748.GD24230@kroah.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:47:48PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Hi Ted and others, > > I see a bunch of ext4 / jbd2 patches were tagged as requested to go into > the -stable tree. But there seems to not be any simple way to determine > what order these patches should go in. > > Can someone please list the order of them, or resend all patches that > they request to go into the 2.6.28-stable tree (and 2.6.27 if some of > the patches apply there as well.) I'll put together git branches versus the 2.6.28-stable and 2.6.27-stable, hopefully in the next week or so. - Ted