From: Akira Fujita Subject: Re: can't get e4defrag to work Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:37:39 +0900 Message-ID: <497D6843.50905@rs.jp.nec.com> References: <7a45233b0901210704w5038d8b8g5c657e3a4746f34d@mail.gmail.com> <49797056.7030607@rs.jp.nec.com> <87f94c370901230751m107afe09w6df76e258c57eae3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Derkjan de Haan , Takashi Sato , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Sandeep K Sinha To: Greg Freemyer Return-path: Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:64224 "EHLO tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751263AbZAZHiG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:38:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87f94c370901230751m107afe09w6df76e258c57eae3@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Greg, Greg Freemyer wrote: > Will the new defrag patchset be based on the ioctl's that Ted > suggested last month? Yes, but the new defrag that I will release corresponds to (3) of Ted's suggestion. (http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=122880166227883&w=3) For (1) and (2), probably it will be necessary to change the allocation method and add new ioctls, so I will address them later. Have you already worked on these features? Regards, Akira Fujita --Separator@a-fujita@rs.jp.nec.com: greg.freemyer@gmail.com haanjdj@gmail.com sandeepksinha@gmail.com linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org