From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: htree indexing and 64-bit file systems Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:31:08 -0500 Message-ID: <20090203233108.GW14762@mit.edu> References: <20090203222202.GK20654@shell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger To: Valerie Aurora Henson Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:46378 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752375AbZBCXbM (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:31:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090203222202.GK20654@shell> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:22:02PM -0500, Valerie Aurora Henson wrote: > I've just been ignoring htree indexing for now, but the regression > failure in Ted's rebased 64bit tree looks suspiciously htree-related. > > What's the interaction between htree and 64 bit file systems? What > needs to change, if anything? There shouldn't be any. The block numbers used in htree are logical block numbers (i.e., block 0 is the first block in the directory, block 1 is the 2nd block i the directory, etc.) - Ted