From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: EXT4 ENOSPC Bug Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:56:23 -0600 Message-ID: <499B4097.90808@redhat.com> References: <20090216162028.3032666a@lithium.local.net> <200811291418.24672.andres@anarazel.de> <200812100108.04163.andres@anarazel.de> <49994FEF.2020908@anarazel.de> <20090216150156.GD22619@mini-me.lan> <499985C7.8010302@anarazel.de> <20090216190001.GB11788@mini-me.lan> <499AFE32.7070003@redhat.com> <499B1935.10906@redhat.com> <20090217223017.3a86a045@lithium.local.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Theodore Tso , Andres Freund , adilger@sun.com, LKML , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: Alex Buell Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:45854 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752851AbZBQW4q (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:56:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090217223017.3a86a045@lithium.local.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Alex Buell wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:08:21 -0600, I waved a wand and this message > magically appears in front of Eric Sandeen: > >> FWIW my problem seems to be different than others have encountered; >> mine persists past reboot, while other reporters have said that a >> reboot (remount) makes the problem go away. >> >> I seem to be encountering some silliness in find_group_flex when 2 out >> of 3 groups are full (I "only" have 55k inodes left, all in the last >> group). > > I've discovered a forced fsck clears this. HTH. Do you have the output of the fsck run? -Eric