From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Subject: Re: mkfs.ext4: high default -i value undocumented
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 01:57:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0903040156530.12894@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0903040007470.12969@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <49ADBB03.9070303@redhat.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.0903040125410.12894@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <49ADCEBB.6080904@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, kzak@redhat.com
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from sovereign.computergmbh.de ([85.214.69.204]:37177 "EHLO
	sovereign.computergmbh.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753247AbZCDA5d (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:57:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <49ADCEBB.6080904@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>


On Wednesday 2009-03-04 01:43, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> the big 
>>>> point is that the mke2fs manpage (belonging to util-linux, hence Cc) 
>>> not so much:
>>> $ rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man8/mke2fs.8.gz
>>> e2fsprogs-1.41.3-2.fc10.x86_64
>> 
>> Sorry, I had looked for man8/mkfs.ext2.8.gz. I am not quite sure
>> what makes some developers deviate(*) from the mkfs.$name/fsck.$name
>> scheme ;-)
>
>$ rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext2.8.gz
>e2fsprogs-1.41.3-2.fc10.x86_64
>:)

/me silently scrubs the cosmic particles from his room.