From: Eric Sandeen Subject: [PATCH V2] fix bb_prealloc_list corruption due to wrong group locking Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:47:37 -0500 Message-ID: <49BE82A9.4000407@redhat.com> References: <49BAD6D9.3010505@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ext4 development Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:52976 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758458AbZCPQru (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:47:50 -0400 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2GGlmWw032635 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:47:48 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2GGlmUW007530 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:47:48 -0400 Received: from neon.msp.redhat.com (neon.msp.redhat.com [10.15.80.10]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2GGllCQ001495 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:47:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49BAD6D9.3010505@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is for Red Hat bug 490026, EXT4 panic, list corruption in ext4_mb_new_inode_pa ext4_lock_group(sb, group) is supposed to protect this list for each group, and a common code flow to remove an album is like this: ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, pa->pa_pstart, &grp, NULL); ext4_lock_group(sb, grp); list_del(&pa->pa_group_list); ext4_unlock_group(sb, grp); so it's critical that we get the right group number back for this prealloc context, to lock the right group (the one associated with this pa) and prevent concurrent list manipulation. however, ext4_mb_put_pa() passes in (pa->pa_pstart - 1) with a comment, /* -1 is to protect from crossing allocation group */ This makes sense for the group_pa, where pa_pstart is advanced by the length which has been used (in ext4_mb_release_context()), and when the entire length has been used, pa_pstart has been advanced to the first block of the next group. However, for inode_pa, pa_pstart is never advanced; it's just set once to the first block in the group and not moved after that. So in this case, if we subtract one in ext4_mb_put_pa(), we are actually locking the *previous* group, and opening the race with the other threads which do not subtract off the extra block. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen --- ndex: linux-2.6/fs/ext4/mballoc.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ linux-2.6/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -3589,6 +3589,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_put_pa(struct ext4_a struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa) { ext4_group_t grp; + ext4_fsblk_t grp_blk; if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&pa->pa_count) || pa->pa_free != 0) return; @@ -3603,8 +3604,12 @@ static void ext4_mb_put_pa(struct ext4_a pa->pa_deleted = 1; spin_unlock(&pa->pa_lock); - /* -1 is to protect from crossing allocation group */ - ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, pa->pa_pstart - 1, &grp, NULL); + grp_blk = pa->pa_pstart; + /* If linear, pa_pstart is in the next block group when pa is used up */ + if (pa->pa_linear) + grp_blk--; + + ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, grp_blk, &grp, NULL); /* * possible race: