From: Frank Mayhar Subject: /proc->/sys change. Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:45:58 -0700 Message-ID: <1238085958.22887.7.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ext4 Return-path: Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:61794 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753704AbZCZQqF (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:46:05 -0400 Received: from wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.93]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id n2QGk1TY018266 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:46:02 -0700 Received: from [172.29.60.126] (bobble.smo.corp.google.com [172.29.60.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id n2QGjwO0012183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:46:00 -0700 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: We just noticed that the patches that added sysfs support and subsequently removed procfs support left two files in /proc. The mb_history and mb_groups file appear to have been overlooked in this process. Or was this intentional? In any event, this is a heads-up. -- Frank Mayhar Google, Inc.