From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix blkdev_issue_flush() failure handling Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:24:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1238419459.30488.42.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> References: <200903291928.14451.bzolnier@gmail.com> <49CFB33A.9020406@redhat.com> <20090330022521.GB13356@mit.edu> <49D03AE1.8070009@redhat.com> <1238413667.30488.2.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <49D0C29C.1060307@uvigo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Eric Sandeen , Theodore Tso , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Fernando Luis =?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1zquez?= Cao Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49D0C29C.1060307@uvigo.es> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:01 +0900, Fernando Luis V=C3=A1zquez Cao wrote= : > Chris Mason wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 22:22 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> Theodore Tso wrote: > >>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:43:22PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >>>> As long as we keep the call there this is probably good, but aft= er > >>>> talking w/ Chris Mason, I think the call is extraneous anyway an= d should > >>>> probably just be removed... > >>>> > >>> Yes, I agree, but it takes a lot of digging to be completely sure= of > >>> that it's safe to remove it. Interestingly, it was you who added= the > >>> patch which added the call to blkdev_issue_flush(): > >>> commit d755fb384250d6bd7fd18a0930e71965acc8e72e > >>> Author: Eric Sandeen > >>> Date: Fri Jul 11 19:27:31 2008 -0400 > >> > >> Yes, it was. Although I got the idea when hch pointed out that Su= SE did > >> this... thanks to Chris. It's come full circle. :) > >=20 > > Grin. I'm not sure the I_DIRTY checks alone are enough to decide t= hat a > > commit is required though. I think the inode could be clean but st= ill > > have metadata that needs commit. >=20 > Chris, I have just sent patches that attempt to fix both ext3 and > ext4 while also adding a per-device sysfs knob tu disable > write-flushes. A previous version of this patch set added a new > generic mount option but comments from Christoph and others > convinced me to turn it into a per-device tunable. Could you take > a look at the patches? >=20 Jens' comment are right on I think. If we get that fixed up we can get rid of all the filesystem mount -o barrier=3Dflush,0,1,xyz confusion an= d set it via the block devices directly. That would be nice ;) -chris