From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [Bug 12829] kernel complains on ENOSPC Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:15:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20090407161537.GA29759@mit.edu> References: <20090310163824.6C767108042@picon.linux-foundation.org> <20090406185823.GE7376@mit.edu> <20090407143146.GA29644@skywalker> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:46321 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752445AbZDGQPm (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:15:42 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090407143146.GA29644@skywalker> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 08:01:46PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Hi Ted, > > No we don't need the patch. The patch is wrong. We are actually taking > into account the allocated blocks in mballoc.c Ok, thanks. I'll marked the patch as "Rejected" in the ext4 patchwork list. (Patchwork is really great for making sure I don't drop a patch, and I was going through it, and I noticed this patch had been outstanding for the last month.) - Ted