From: Thierry Vignaud Subject: Re: fsck.ext4: Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:56:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <49E8B5AD.6030907@redhat.com> <49EDEBCC.3030008@redhat.com> <49EDF6E8.7070101@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeremy Sanders , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from mx1.moondrake.net ([212.85.150.166]:45657 "EHLO mx1.mandriva.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753197AbZDUQ4d (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:56:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49EDF6E8.7070101@redhat.com> (Eric Sandeen's message of "Tue\, 21 Apr 2009 11\:40\:08 -0500") Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Eric Sandeen writes: > Could you send me dumpe2fs -h output of the large target device, as > well as an "e2image -r" image of the source filesystem? That way I > can hopefully perfectly replicate your target filesystem as well as > the data you're using to populate it, try the cp myself, and see if I > hit the same thing. > > e2image only sends metadata information, not data. If you are > concerned about filenames, use -s to scramble them, though this > *might* impact my ability to reproduce it... I'll do (disk's at home). Filesystems were formatted with standard mkfs.ext4 (some were formated with mkfs.ext4 -F which is why diskdrake default to), that us using std /etc/mke2fs.conf.