From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ext3 data=guarded v5 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:12:18 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20090429110828.4B08.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1240941840.15136.44.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Jan Kara , Linus Torvalds , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linux Kernel Developers List , Ext4 Developers List , Mike Galbraith To: Chris Mason Return-path: Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:36792 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755162AbZD2CMX (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:12:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1240941840.15136.44.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi > Hello everyone, > > I've rediffed the ext3 data=guarded code against Linus' current git > tree, and worked in most of Jan's suggestions: I'm not fs expert and I can't review it technically. but please don't use the name of "guarded". this word implies strong protection. I think end-user can misunderstand this mode make slowness and strong protect much than "mode=journal".