From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Use -1 as the fake block number for delayed new buffer_head Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:35:46 +0530 Message-ID: <20090501190546.GA920@skywalker> References: <1241003611-3652-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090501185841.GG7681@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:56510 "EHLO e23smtp06.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754105AbZEATF4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2009 15:05:56 -0400 Received: from d23relay01.au.ibm.com (d23relay01.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.243]) by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n41J5oBR002759 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 05:05:50 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay01.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n41J5sr0389212 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 05:05:55 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n41J5rAE008066 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 05:05:54 +1000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090501185841.GG7681@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:58:41PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > You mean "for 2.6.30", right? > The reason for me to post two series one for 2.6.30 and other for 2.6.31 was the [Patch 2/2] for 2.6.31 needs more testing. I added this specific patch in both the series to make sure we don't miss the change in case we decided not to make any changes for 2.6.30. Also in my testing I created different topgit branches with different dependencies. So having [PATCH 1/2 ] in both the series helped in testing with topgit branches. -aneesh