From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2] ext4: Convert ext4_lock_group to use sb_bgl_lock Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:39:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20090504113931.GB6766@mit.edu> References: <1241312002-12598-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1241428267-13727-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:46969 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751737AbZEDLjq (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 07:39:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1241428267-13727-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 02:41:07PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > This patch also change mb_set_bits from > static void mb_set_bits(spinlock_t *lock, void *bm, int cur, int len) > > to > > static void mb_set_bits(int cur, void *bm, int len) > > as per Andreas suggesion. Could you separate this change out as a separate patch? As Andreas' pointed out, that really should be a separate change Thanks!! - Ted