From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4/jbd2: remove stray markers Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:58:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20090506115850.GO25203@elte.hu> References: <20090506104436.GA24047@lst.de> <20090506110354.GG25203@elte.hu> <20090506114051.GA4964@mit.edu> <20090506114415.GA26947@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Theodore Tso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fr?d?ric Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:36946 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889AbZEFL7G (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 07:59:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090506114415.GA26947@lst.de> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I was planning to do make sure it's all gone. Once we are into > the 2.6.31 merge dinwo I fear that the final patches will miss the > window due to all these interdependencies. But Ingo didn't seem > to be too interested in taking the other patches that would be > required for it, so I guess I'll try to somehow get it done in the > merge window and otherwise we'll have to wait for 2.6.32. Well, while coupling to lots of subsystems is natural for something as intrinsic as the tracing tree - still i dont want to over-do it. In little over a month these patches can go into their local subsystem trees, without any interactions with anything. So the patches you did are nice - just (as it is usual with any core kernel tree) the logistics have to be planned carefully. Ingo