From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 13369] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:3123
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 02:52:48 GMT
Message-ID: <200905240252.n4O2qmEu012024@demeter.kernel.org>
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Return-path:
Received: from demeter.kernel.org ([140.211.167.39]:49829 "EHLO
demeter.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
with ESMTP id S1752962AbZEXCwr (ORCPT
); Sat, 23 May 2009 22:52:47 -0400
Received: from demeter.kernel.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by demeter.kernel.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n4O2qmwD012025
for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 02:52:48 GMT
In-Reply-To:
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369
Theodore Tso changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tytso@mit.edu
--- Comment #5 from Theodore Tso 2009-05-24 02:52:48 ---
So I'm glad you're using a filesystem with a 1k blocksize since it provides a
good test case for us --- and we don't do enough testing for the case where the
blocksize != pagesize. But you do realize that the ext4 filesystem will be
far more efficient with the larger 4k blocksize, right?
I'm not able to reproduce the problem on a filesystem with 1k blocksize running
fsx, fsstress, and dbench using a 2.6.30-rc6 kernel with the full ext4 patch
queue, using a netbook with an dual-core N270 Atom processor. I'm retrying
with a stock 2.6.30-rc6 kernel now...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.