From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Some 64-bit tests Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:11:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20090618211112.GE7183@mit.edu> References: <18887.1244469441@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <20090608201037.GB23723@skywalker> <14597.1244517228@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <20090610181320.GA6953@mit.edu> <20090611055006.GA8073@skywalker> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nick Dokos , Valerie Aurora , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:53224 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753443AbZFRVLU (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:11:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090611055006.GA8073@skywalker> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:20:06AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > I already have a RFC patch which Nick actually tested. It is giving 32MB > extents, which is expected because the max order in buddy cache is > blocksize_bits + 1. I have a Fixme in there regarding scaling the start > block which was hoping to fix soon. FYI, this patch seems to cause the system to lock up on umount when running xfstests #135. I'm removing it from the unstable patch queue for now; do you have an update for this patch? - Ted