From: Christian Kujau Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] decnet: Use rcu_barrier() on module unload. Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:15:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1245845367.24921.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <5A680E0A-EFEB-44EA-9F06-F338E6CBD6D1@googlemail.com> <1245930729.24921.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090625.161046.19938291.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Miller , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, netdev , LKML , Patrick McHardy , yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@gmail.com To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:56542 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751257AbZF0DQP (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:16:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > I'll resubmit the patches to you and netdev, to limit the spam effect... Out of curiosity: why was linux-ext4 Cc'ed on these rcu_barrier patches (but not other fs-lists but linux-nfs)? I did not see any ../fs/ext4/ changes. Christian. -- BOFH excuse #6: global warming