From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: A tree to pull into linux-next Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:47:51 -0400 Message-ID: <20090716114751.GE21267@mit.edu> References: <20090715193742.GA18583@duck.suse.cz> <20090716164826.f4edbd42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , Stephen Tweedie , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:53923 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751118AbZGPLsT (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:48:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090716164826.f4edbd42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:48:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I am happy to include this, but (no offense) I would like to hear from > the ext3 and jbd maintainers (cc'd) about it. > The main isssue would be that akpm often has ext3 changes stashed in -mm. Having a separate ext3 tree makes sense, and if Jan wants to maintain it, that makes good sense to me, but we should get Andrew's sign off, and Jan should make sure he has any ext3/jbd patches that might be in -mm, to avoid any potential patch conflicts. - Ted