From: Valerie Aurora Subject: Re: e2fsck results on a 96TB fs. Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:37:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20090727183756.GR27582@shell> References: <8735.1248711127@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Dokos Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42450 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753842AbZG0Sh5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:37:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8735.1248711127@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 12:12:07PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > This is with 2.6.31-rc4 (and some necessary DM fixes - I got those > from agk's tree last Friday - they *may* be in mainline > by now). e2fsprogs was current as of late last week. Nice! We still have some bugs, but it's nice to see that 64-bit e2fsprogs is getting to the point where we are finding bugs in other pieces of software more often than in e2fsprogs. :) -VAL