From: Valerie Aurora Subject: Re: Fix device too big bug in mainline? Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:28:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20090804182811.GG9324@shell> References: <20090730215302.GA31141@shell> <20090802002833.GB8680@mit.edu> <20090802022209.GC8680@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen , Ric Wheeler To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42992 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933137AbZHDS2M (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:28:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090802022209.GC8680@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 10:22:09PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > In case people are wondering why it's taking so long to merge the > 64-bit patch series, let me show one patch as exhibit 'A' about how > not to submit patches to me (or Linus, or any other upstream > maintainer): Oh, geez, those are an old patch set! I did go back and fix the temporary commits and dangly semi-colons, plus reimplemented progress meters the way you wanted: http://osdir.com/ml/linux-ext4/2009-02/msg00591.html I just forgot because I sent it back in February. :( I hope you can merge those changes without a lot of trouble. -VAL