From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20090810160949.GA21948@infradead.org> References: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lachlan McIlroy , Eric Sandeen , ext4 development , xfs-oss To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:47970 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755312AbZHJQJt (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > > This looks good Eric. > > > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota > > enforcement too? > > I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do > a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well. Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing.