From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: What happened to data=guarded? Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:57:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20090811185703.GQ1756@mit.edu> References: <1249934623-15939-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <200908111535.37927.elendil@planet.nl> <20090811133721.GD29224@think> <200908111654.38217.elendil@planet.nl> <878whqgyid.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Frans Pop , Chris Mason , jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:44596 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751227AbZHKS5N (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:57:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878whqgyid.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:29:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Good to hear. I've so far stayed with data=ordered as I think I'd prefer > > data=guarded over data=writeback. I'll certainly give it a try when it's > > available. > > Same here. data=writeback already cost me a few files after crashes here :/ What sort of files were you losing? I don't know if we can improve the implied flush hueristics, but we should at least try to see if we do something about it. - Ted